InsurTech AI

Insurance AI that processes documents, not just reads them.

We build AI systems that extract structured data from insurance documents, automate underwriting and claims workflows, and detect fraud - integrated with the core systems your operations team already runs.

Discuss your InsurTech build

< 2 min

Submission-to-quote with underwriting AI

90%+

Straight-through processing rate on simple claims

40–60%

Reduction in document processing cost

Use cases

Underwriting Automation

Ingest structured and unstructured risk data - property surveys, financial statements, loss histories - and generate underwriting recommendations with supporting rationale. Reduces submission-to-quote time from days to minutes.

ML scoringDocument AIStructured output

Claims Triage & Processing

First notice of loss classification, coverage verification, reserve estimation, and straight-through processing for simple claims. Complex claims flagged for adjuster review with pre-populated data packets.

NLPClassificationWorkflow AI

Policy Document Intelligence

LLM-based extraction of policy terms, coverage limits, sublimits, exclusions, endorsements, and conditions from unstructured policy documents - normalised to a structured schema for downstream systems.

LLMRAGExtraction

Fraud Detection

Anomaly detection on claims patterns, network analysis for organised fraud rings, and document authenticity verification - trained on insurance-specific fraud typologies.

Graph MLAnomaly detectionReal-time

Document AI deep dive

Insurance documents are complex, inconsistent, and full of legal language. Here is exactly what we extract - and how.

Policy termsNamed insured, policy period, premium, payment schedule
Coverage limitsPer-occurrence limits, aggregate limits, sublimits by coverage type
ExclusionsNamed perils excluded, jurisdictional exclusions, war & terrorism
EndorsementsCoverage extensions, modifications, manuscript endorsements
ConditionsClaims notification requirements, subrogation rights, cooperation clauses

Extraction uses a hybrid approach: layout-aware document parsing, fine-tuned LLM extraction with schema constraints, and confidence scoring on every field. Low-confidence extractions are routed to human review queues automatically.

Underwriting AI

Inputs

Loss history

Property data

Financial statements

Third-party signals

Benchmark portfolios

Model

Risk scoring engine

Limit recommendation

Pricing adjustment

Referral triggers

Appetite checks

Output

Indication letter

Quote with rationale

Referred risk summary

Declination with reason

Audit trail

Compliance

GDPR & Data Retention

Personal data minimisation, retention schedules, right to erasure pipelines, and lawful basis documentation for all AI processing activities.

Adverse Action & Explainability

Where AI influences insurance decisions, we provide SHAP-based attribution and plain-language explanations suitable for adverse action notices.

Model Governance

Inventory of all production models, performance monitoring, drift alerts, and annual revalidation cycles - aligned to Solvency II and FCA model risk guidance.

Integration points

Guidewire

ClaimCenter and PolicyCenter integrations via REST API and Gosu customisation layers.

Duck Creek

Policy, billing, and claims module integrations with Duck Creek OnDemand and on-premise deployments.

Salesforce FS Cloud

Opportunity management, policy tracking, and AI-generated renewal communications.

Document Management

OpenText, SharePoint, and custom DMS integrations for policy and claims document workflows.

Case Study - InsurTech

"Policy document extraction at 94% field accuracy - 3× faster submission turnaround for a Lloyd's syndicate."

LLM extraction pipeline processing 2,000+ policy documents per day across 14 coverage lines. Integrated with Guidewire PolicyCenter. Confidence-based routing reduced adjuster review volume by 61%.

Insurance AI - by the numbers

94%

Field extraction accuracy on multi-line policy documents

< 2 min

Submission-to-indication with underwriting AI

61%

Reduction in adjuster review volume via confidence-based routing

Faster claims straight-through processing vs. manual workflows

The old way vs. the new way

Why legacy insurance ops can't scale

Without AI

Underwriters manually review 40+ page submissions - 2–5 days per quote

Claims examiners read unstructured PDFs, transcribe data by hand

Fraud detection relies on rule-based filters; sophisticated rings go undetected

Policy document review requires specialist legal interpretation at every step

Renewals managed via spreadsheets; churn risk identified only after lapse

With StartxLabs AI

Submission ingested, risk scored, and indication generated in under 2 minutes

LLM extraction pipeline normalises 2,000+ documents per day to structured schema

Graph ML + anomaly detection catches organised fraud rings in real time

Coverage terms, exclusions, and endorsements extracted with 94% field accuracy

AI renewal propensity scoring flags at-risk policies 60 days before renewal date

Architecture

How our claims AI pipeline works

01

FNOL Intake

Email, portal, or API submission captured and normalised

02

Document Parse

Layout-aware extraction of photos, PDFs, and claim forms

03

Coverage Verify

Policy retrieved and coverage terms matched to claim type

04

Reserve Estimate

ML reserve model estimates loss cost with confidence range

05

STP or Route

Simple claims closed automatically; complex claims routed with data packet

End-to-end pipeline latency: under 90 seconds for simple claims. Confidence thresholds are configurable per line of business. All decisions logged to an immutable audit trail integrated with Guidewire ClaimCenter.

Common questions

InsurTech AI - what clients ask us first

Can AI extraction handle non-standard policy wordings?

Yes. We use a hybrid of layout parsing and fine-tuned LLMs that generalise across bespoke wordings, manuscript endorsements, and non-standard structures. We validate against a test set from your document population before go-live.

How do you handle low-confidence extractions?

Every extracted field carries a confidence score. Fields below your configured threshold are automatically queued for human review with a pre-filled UI - reviewers confirm or correct, and feedback improves the model.

Is the underwriting AI explainable for regulatory purposes?

Yes. We output SHAP-based attribution for every risk score. The explanation identifies which input features drove the recommendation, making it suitable for adverse action notices and regulatory audit.

What does integration with Guidewire or Duck Creek look like?

We integrate via their published APIs and where needed through customisation layers (Gosu for Guidewire). Data flows bidirectionally - AI results write back into the core system, not just a side dashboard.

How long does a typical InsurTech AI engagement take to go live?

Document extraction pipelines typically reach production in 10–14 weeks. Underwriting AI with full integration takes 16–24 weeks depending on data quality and API access. We scope this precisely during discovery.

Ready to build your
next digital product?

Whether you have a detailed specification or just an early idea - we'll help you scope it, challenge the assumptions, and deliver it on time. No pitch decks. Straight to the point.

What happens next

1

Send us a message

Tell us what you're building or what's broken.

2

Discovery call (30 min)

We ask hard questions. You get honest answers.

3

Scoped proposal

Clear deliverables, timeline, and team in 48 hours.

Contact Us

Tell us about
your project

Whether you have a detailed brief or just an early idea, we will help you scope it, challenge it, and ship it.

  • Agentic AI development and multi-agent systems
  • Generative AI consulting and LLM integration
  • RAG development and custom model deployment
  • Data engineering, MLOps and custom software
[email protected]

We respond within one business day. Your data is handled in accordance with our privacy policy.